Why report an effect size
A p-value answers “is there an effect?” but not “how much?” With a large enough sample, a trivial difference becomes statistically significant. The effect size reports the magnitude in interpretable units, so readers can judge whether the finding matters, not just whether it cleared p < 0.05. See effect size explained.
Interpreting the numbers
See it: the effect size visualizer shows any d as two overlapping distributions, with plain-language translations.
Cohen's benchmarks — d = 0.2 (small), 0.5 (medium), 0.8 (large) — are rough conventions, not laws; a “small” effect can be hugely important in context. For correlations, |r| of 0.1 / 0.3 / 0.5 play the same roles. Always report the effect size with a confidence interval.
Worked example
Two groups with means 85 and 80 and a pooled SD of 10 give Cohen's d = (85−80)/10 = 0.5 — a medium effect. The same five-point gap with a pooled SD of 2 gives d = 2.5, a very large one. Enter your means and SDs above to compute d.
Common mistakes
- Reporting only the p-value — significance without magnitude is half the story.
- Treating Cohen's cutoffs as absolute — interpret within your field.
- Using effect size to plan samples after the fact — feed a target effect into the sample-size calculator before collecting data.